Unknown

(PC) Long v. Unknown

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 30, 20242:24-cv-01932California288 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KEVIN MICHAEL LONG, No. 2:24-cv-1932 CKD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND UNKNOWN, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Defendants. 16 On July 19, 2024, plaintiff was ordered to submit a completed in forma pauperis application including a certified copy of his inmate trust account statement within thirty days. Plaintiff was warned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The thirty-day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order. Accordingly, IT IS HHEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court assign a district court judge to this case; and IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.