Castillo

(PC) Bratton v. Castillo

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 3, 20242:21-cv-00076California429 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TORY BRATTON, No. 2:21-CV-0076-DMC-P Plaintiff, v. ORDER CASTILLO, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the Court are Plaintiff's motion to compel responses to requests for production of documents, ECF No. 38, and Plaintiff's motion to compel responses to interrogatories, ECF No. 39. Also before the Court is Plaintiff's motion for an in camera review, ECF No. 40. Defendants have filed oppositions to all three motions, ECF Nos. 41 and 42. In his motions to compel, Plaintiff does not challenge the sufficiency of responses received but, instead, argues that he never received responses. See ECF Nos. 38 and 39. As reflected in defense counsel's declaration, Plaintiff served requests for production of documents on all Defendants on April 14, 2024, interrogatories on Defendants…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.