Stoller

(PC) Nguyen v. Stoller

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 30, 20242:23-cv-01157California706 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAI NGUYEN, No. 2:23-CV-1157-WBS-DMC-P Plaintiff, v. ORDER JOHN STOLLER, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brought this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On July 22, 2024, the Court dismissed this action for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted and final judgment has been entered. See ECF Nos. 21 and 22. Pending before the Court in this closed case is Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration of the Court's July 22, 2024, final order. See ECF No. 23. The Court may grant reconsideration under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 59(e) and 60. Generally, a motion for reconsideration of a final judgment is appropriately brought under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e). See Backlund v. Barnhart, 778 F.2d 1386, 1388 (9th Cir. 1985) (discussing reconsideration of summary judgment); see also Schroeder v. McDonald, 55 F.3d 454,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.