Hanley
Hanley v. Wilkens
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 3, 20241:22-cv-00404California3,406 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
ROLLAND HANLEY, Case No. 1:22-cv-00404-JLT-SAB
Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
RECOMMENDING GRANTING
v. DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS
WITH PREJUDICE FOR LACK OF
WILKINS, PROSECUTION
Defendants. (ECF Nos. 26, 28)
OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN
DAYS
15 Currently before the Court is Brandon Wilkins motion to dismiss this action for lack of prosecution. (ECF No. 26.) The Court, having reviewed the record, finds this matter suitable for decision without oral argument. See Local Rule 230(g). Having considered the moving and reply papers, the declarations and exhibits attached thereto, as well as the Court’s file, the Court issues the following findings and recommendations. I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY Rolland Hanley (“Plaintiff”), a detainee at the Merced County jail, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil rights…