Hanley

Hanley v. Wilkens

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 3, 20241:22-cv-00404California3,406 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROLLAND HANLEY, Case No. 1:22-cv-00404-JLT-SAB

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING GRANTING

v. DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS

WITH PREJUDICE FOR LACK OF

WILKINS, PROSECUTION

Defendants. (ECF Nos. 26, 28)

OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN

DAYS

15 Currently before the Court is Brandon Wilkins motion to dismiss this action for lack of prosecution. (ECF No. 26.) The Court, having reviewed the record, finds this matter suitable for decision without oral argument. See Local Rule 230(g). Having considered the moving and reply papers, the declarations and exhibits attached thereto, as well as the Court’s file, the Court issues the following findings and recommendations. I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY Rolland Hanley (“Plaintiff”), a detainee at the Merced County jail, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil rights…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.