(PC) Brooks v. North Kern State Prison

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 4, 20241:23-cv-01751California854 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVION LAMAR BROOKS, Case No. 1:23-cv-1751 JLT BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING IN PART THE

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

v. DISMISSING THE ACTION WITHOUT

PREJUDICE, AND DIRECTING THE CLERK

NORTH KERN STATE PRISON, et al., OF COURT TO CLOSE THE CASE Defendants. (Doc. 13) 16 Davion Lamar Brooks is a state prisoner, who sought to hold the defendants—including North Kern State Prison and the assistant warden at the facility—liable for violations of his civil rights. (See Doc. 1.) The magistrate judge screened Plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a) and found Plaintiff failed to state a cognizable claim upon which relief may be granted. (Doc. 11 at 4-11.) The magistrate judge observed that Plaintiff appeared to challenge his RVR conviction and resulting time added to his sentence. (Id. at 4.) The magistrate judge noted that Plaintiff’s “damages allegations expressly implicate the validity of his…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.