Tice-Raskin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LUKE JAMES KOPP, No. 2:23-cv-02631-DAD-SCR Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS S. ROBERT TICE-RASKIN, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this matter, which is referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). Plaintiff’s action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 names as Defendants a state court judge and an attorney. The Complaint does not allege discernible facts but rather refers to attachments, which are similarly unclear. See ECF No. 1 at 5-11. Defendant Susan Kay McGuire moved to dismiss, arguing that she is not a state actor for purposes of liability under § 1983 and that the complaint fails to comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8. ECF No. 6. Defendant S. Robert Tice-Raskin moved to dismiss on the basis of absolute judicial immunity. ECF No. 10. Plaintiff filed documents in response which fail to directly respond to the legal arguments raised in the motions to dismiss,…