Asman

(PS) Schmitz v. Asman

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 4, 20242:20-cv-00195California1,368 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 THOMAS SCHMITZ, et al., No. 2:20-cv-00195 DJC CKD PS Plaintiffs, v. ORDER ADAM ASMAN, et al., Defendants.

16 Plaintiff, Dianne Mallia, proceeds without counsel and moves the court to determine the sufficiency of responses to discovery requests served to defendants Dr. Diana Toche and Dr. John Rekart. (ECF No. 389.) Plaintiff also requests the court allow her to propound additional interrogatories to defendants Sujatha Ramkumar, M.D. and Jacob Adams, M.D. (Id.) The parties’ joint statement on the discovery dispute is before the court. (Id.) This matter was deemed suitable for decision without appearance and oral argument under Local Rule 230(g). (ECF No. 390.) For the reasons set forth below, the motion to compel is denied in part, as to the request to propound additional interrogatories. Within 21 days of the date of this order, the parties shall file a further joint statement on the remaining portion of the discovery dispute.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.