Bettencourt
(PS) Robinson v. Bettencourt
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROSE A. ROBINSON, Case No. 2:24-cv-00760-KJM-JDP (PS) Plaintiff, ORDER v. SCREENING THE COMPLAINT AND
GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION
DENNIS BETTENCOURT, et al., TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS Defendants. ECF Nos. 1 & 2 AMENDED COMPLAINT DUE WITHIN
THIRTY DAYS
17 Plaintiff Rose Robinson has filed a complaint against Dennis Bettencourt, Costal Capital Private Lender & Investments, and Wells Fargo Home Mortgage. Her complaint, however, fails to state a claim, and I will recommend that it be dismissed with leave to amend. I will grant plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis, ECF No. 2, which makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(a)(1) and (2). Screening and Pleading Requirements A complaint must contain a short and plain statement that plaintiff is entitled to relief, Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(2), and provide “enough facts to…