Lester

(PS) Mandujano v. Lester

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 4, 20242:23-cv-02385California614 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 YANAH MANDUJANO, No. 2:23-cv-02385-DJC-CKD (PS) Plaintiff, v. ORDER KATHERINE LESTER, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Yanah Mandujano, appearing pro se, filed this fee paid complaint against Defendants Katherine Lester, “Unnamed Sacramento Police Officer,” Darren Pytel, “Unnamed” Davis Police Officer, and Rob Bonta. (ECF No. 1.)1 Defendants filed a series of separate motions to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), which were set to be heard on March 6, 2024. (ECF Nos. 5, 8, 9.) The undersigned took Defendants’ motions under submission without oral argument in accordance with Local Rule 230(g). (ECF No. 14.) On May 5, 2024, Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint. (ECF No. 16.) On March 22, 2024, Defendant Bonta filed a motion to dismiss the First Amended Complaint, which was set to be heard on May 1, 2024. (ECF No. 20.) On April 26, 2024, the undersigned construed Plaintiff’s First Amended 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.