(PC) Reed v. Solano County Justice Center

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 5, 20242:23-cv-01101California931 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ZAYA REED, No. 2:23-cv-1101 CSK P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS &

RECOMMENDATIONS

SOLANO COUNTY JUSTICE CENTER, et al., 15 Defendants.

17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On June 14, 2024, defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. On June 17, 2024, defendants advised plaintiff of the requirements for opposing a motion pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (ECF No. 19 (citing Woods v. Carey, 684 F.3d 934 (9th Cir. 2012); Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952, 957 (9th Cir. 1998) (en banc)).) Plaintiff did not file an opposition. On July 23, 2024, plaintiff was ordered to file an opposition or a statement of non- opposition to the pending motion within thirty days. (ECF No. 21.) In that same order, plaintiff was advised of the requirements for filing an opposition to the pending motion and that failure to oppose…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.