Lawrence

Lawrence v. Cenlar F.S.B.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 5, 20241:22-cv-01627California6,883 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMES LAWRENCE, MARILYN Case No. 1:22-cv-01627-JLT-CDB

MELLIES,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND Plaintiffs, DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT CENLAR’S MOTION TO DISMISS AND v. GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT CITIBANK’S MOTION CENLAR F.S.B., CITIBANK, N.A., and TO DISMISS DOES 1 through 10, (Docs. 10, 13.) Defendants. 17 I. INTRODUCTION This case concerns the foreclosure of the residence owned by James Lawrence and Marilyn Mellies’ in Ridgecrest, California. Before the Court are motions to dismiss brought by Citibank, N.A. (“Citibank”) and Cenlar FSB (“Cenlar”) (collectively “Defendants”). (Docs. 10, 13.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court grants in part and denies in part Citibank’s motion to dismiss (Doc. 10), and grants in part and denies in part Cenlar’s motion to dismiss (Doc. 13).1 ///

26 The Court’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.