(SS)(PS) School v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 6, 20242:24-cv-00765California286 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 MICHAEL CHARLES SCHOOL, No. 2:24-cv-00765-TLN-AC Plaintiff, v. ORDER MARTIN O’MALLEY, Defendant.

16 Plaintiff, proceeding without counsel, filed the above captioned civil action. The matter 17 was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local 18 Rule 302. 19 On July 17, 2024, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 20 were served on all parties, and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the 21 findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. (ECF No. 10.) The time 22 to file objections has passed, and neither party filed any objections. 23 The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 24 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 25 See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed 26 the file, the Court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.