(PS) Whittman v. Chico Court

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 6, 20242:24-cv-01575California780 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARVIN WHITTMAN, No. 2:24-cv-01575-DJC-CKD (PS) Plaintiff, ORDER v. CHICO COURT. Defendant. 16 On August 14, 2024, Defendant Chico Court filed a motion to dismiss Plaintiff Marvin Whittman’s complaint. (ECF No. 7.) Defendant noticed its motion for a hearing to take place on October 2, 2024, at 10:00 a.m. before the undersigned. Id. Pursuant to this court’s Local Rules, any opposition to the motion was to be filed and served no later than fourteen (14) days after the date the motion was filed. Further, a responding party who has no opposition to the granting of the motion is required to serve and file a statement of non-opposition. See E.D. Cal. L.R. 230(c) (“[a] responding party who has no opposition to the granting of the motion shall serve and file a statement to that effect, specifically designating the motion in question”). That deadline has now passed, and Plaintiff has not filed either a statement of opposition or a statement…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.