(PS) McGee v. State of CA

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 6, 20242:24-cv-00012California347 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JEFFERSON A. McGEE, No. 2:24-cv-00012-TLN-AC Plaintiff, v. ORDER THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is proceeding in this action in pro per. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On August 7, 2024, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties, and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 214.) Plaintiff filed objections to the findings and recommendations, which the Court considered. (ECF No. 215.) The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.