Campbell
(PC) Hill v. Campbell
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TONY HILL, Case No. 1:23-cv-01103 JLT EPG Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS
TO REOPEN CASE AND REQUEST FOR
v. RELEASE TAMMY COMPAELL, (Docs. 21, 22, and 23) Defendant. 16 Tony Hill alleges violations of his civil rights in his complaint. (Doc. 1.) The Court found Plaintiff is subject to the three-strikes bar of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), and he did not satisfy the “imminent danger of serious physical injury” exception to § 1915(g). Therefore, the Court ordered Plaintiff to pay the filing fee. (Doc. 10.) After he failed to do so, the Court dismissed the action without prejudice. (Doc. 15.) The Court entered judgment on October 10, 2023. (Doc. 16.) Plaintiff appealed the dismissal to the Ninth Circuit, which dismissed the appeal for failure to prosecute on December 27, 2023. (Doc. 20.) On July 10, 2024, Plaintiff filed a motion to reopen the case. (Doc. 23.) Plaintiff asserts 25 …