Allen

Allen v. Summit

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 9, 20241:23-cv-01549California840 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 JERRAD DUPREE ALLEN, CASE No. 1:23-cv-01549-SAB

Plaintiff, ORDER FINDING SERVICE OF FIRST v. AMENDED COMPLAINT APPROPRIATE AND FORWARDING SERVICE CORTEZ SUMMIT, et al. DOCUMENTS TO PLAINTIFF FOR COMPLETION AND RETURN Defendants. THIRTY DAY DEADLINE 15 Plaintiff Jerrad Dupree Allen (“Plaintiff”) is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against Defendants Bakersfield Police Department Officers Cortez Summit, Victor Coronado, and Dominic Ramirez. Based on a review of the first amended complaint filed on July 8, 2024,1 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B), the Court finds Plaintiff’s first amended complaint states cognizable claims for (1) excessive force in violation of the Fourth Amendment against Officer Summit and Officer Coronado, and (2) failure to provide objectively reasonable post-arrest medical care…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.