Mendonca

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHARLOTTE MENDONCA, No. 2:24-cv-00994-JAM-CKD Plaintiff, ORDER v. (ECF Nos. 3, 6) YOUNG HEE LEE, et al., Defendants. 16 On August 26, 2024, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations to deny 17 plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis in this action, finding that plaintiff’s application 18 indicates he is not unable to pay the filing fee. (ECF Nos. 3, 6.) The findings and 19 recommendations were served on plaintiff and advised plaintiff that no objections period was 20 required. See Minetti v. Port of Seattle, 152 F.3d 1113, 1114 (9th Cir. 1998), as amended 21 (Sept. 9, 1998) (holding that plaintiffs are not entitled to file written objections to magistrate 22 judge recommendation to deny IFP status). Plaintiff has not filed objections. 23 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 24 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. 25 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 26 1. …