Jones

(PC) McDonald v. Jones

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 6, 20242:24-cv-01027California2,392 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JEFFREY D. MCDONALD, No. 2:24-cv-1027 CSK P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

GENA JONES, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the Court is plaintiff’s motion for a temporary restraining order filed September 3, 2024. (ECF No. 10.) For the reasons stated herein, this Court recommends that plaintiff’s motion be denied. I. Legal Standards Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65 governs injunctions and restraining orders, and requires that a motion for temporary restraining order include “specific facts in an affidavit or a verified complaint [that] clearly show that immediate, and irreparable injury, loss, or damage will result to the movant before the adverse party can be heard in opposition,” as well as written certification from the movant’s attorney stating “any efforts made to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.