Anita Valladores v. Ashtree Apartments, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9 10 ANITA VALLADORES, et al., Case No. 1:20-cv-01155-KES-SAB 11 Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO MODIFY THE SCHEDULING ORDER v. ORDER VACATING HEARING SET FOR

ASHTREE APARTMENTS, LLC, OCTOBER 2, 2024

14 (ECF Nos. 48, 49) Defendant. 15

I. INTRODUCTION On August 5, 2024, Defendant filed a motion to amend the scheduling order to allow Defendant to submit its expert report for Randall S. Stout. (ECF No. 48.) Pursuant to Local Rule 230(c), Plaintiffs’ opposition was due on August 19, 2024; however, one was not filed until September 4, 2024. The Local Rules provide that a party who fails to file a timely opposition is not entitled to be heard in opposition to the motion at oral argument. L.R. 230(c). Accordingly, the hearing set for October 2, 2024 will be vacated. The Court finds a reply brief would not aid the Court in deciding the instant motion. For the reasons set forth…