Juarez

(PC) Pena v. Juarez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 9, 20241:23-cv-01400California329 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DANIEL ANTHONY PENA, No. 1:23-cv-01400-JLT-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER TERMINATING ACTION

PURSUANT TO PARTIES’ STIPULATION

v. FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL J. JUAREZ, et al., (ECF No. 36) Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On September 9, 2024, the parties filed a stipulation to dismiss this action with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, as the case has been resolved in its entirety. (ECF No. 36.) Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) provides in pertinent part that, “the plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing ... a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared. A voluntary stipulation to dismiss an action pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) automatically terminates the action without operation of a court order.” Black Rock City, LLC v. Pershing…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.