Heslop

(PC) Wilkins v. Heslop

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 9, 20242:20-cv-01622California908 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KEENAN WILKINS, No. 2:20-cv-01622 DJC SCR P Plaintiff, v. ORDER S. HESLOP, Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Keenan Wilkins, a state prisoner, proceeds pro se with civil rights claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and state law claims. On August 19. 2024, the undersigned issued an order granting in part and denying in part plaintiff’s motion to compel filed on June 7, 2024. (ECF Nos. 62, 73.) The undersigned also ordered defendants to submit for in camera review the documents responsive to plaintiff’s Request for Production of Documents, Set Two, Nos. 2 and 4. (ECF No. 73 at 10.) Defendants have submitted the documents for in camera review and moved for a protective order. (ECF No. 74, 75.) I. Document Production The court has reviewed the responsive documents at issue, described as follows in defendants’ privilege log: CDCR Form 3013-2 (Inmate Interview for Allegation Worksheet) for appeal log no.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.