UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 ADAM SHARPE, No. 1:19-cv-00711-KES-EPG (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
RECOMMENDING THAT DEFENDANT
v.
NULES’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY
C. CRYER, et al., JUDGMENT BE GRANTED
Defendants. (ECF No. 173)
OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN
THIRTY (30) DAYS
I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Adam Sharpe is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case proceeds on Plaintiff’s claims that Defendants C. Cryer, J. Lewis, S. Gates, and C. Nules were deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs for specialized contact lenses in violation of the Eighth Amendment. (ECF Nos. 141, 143). On May 30, 2024, Nules filed a motion for summary judgment, arguing that she is entitled to summary judgment because her staff worked diligently to schedule Plaintiff medical care and the delays encountered were…