Huerta

Huerta v. County of Tulare

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 10, 20241:17-cv-01446California339 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 JOSEFINA1 HUERTA, Case No. 1:17-cv-01446-EPG Plaintiff, ORDER RE: STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL

WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO FED. R.

v. CIV. P. 41(a) 13 COUNTY OF TULARE, et al., (ECF No. 219). 14 Defendants.

16 On September 6, 2024, the parties filed a joint stipulation for dismissal with prejudice of all claims in this action and with each party to bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs. (ECF No. 219). In light of the parties’ stipulation, this action has been terminated, Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), and has been dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs. Additionally, the parties have requested that the Court retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the Settlement Agreement and Addendum. (ECF No. 219 at 2). The Court will retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the settlement agreement for one year from the date of this order. See Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.