Huerta
Huerta v. County of Tulare
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 JOSEFINA1 HUERTA, Case No. 1:17-cv-01446-EPG Plaintiff, ORDER RE: STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO FED. R.
v. CIV. P. 41(a) 13 COUNTY OF TULARE, et al., (ECF No. 219). 14 Defendants.
16 On September 6, 2024, the parties filed a joint stipulation for dismissal with prejudice of all claims in this action and with each party to bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs. (ECF No. 219). In light of the parties’ stipulation, this action has been terminated, Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), and has been dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs. Additionally, the parties have requested that the Court retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the Settlement Agreement and Addendum. (ECF No. 219 at 2). The Court will retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the settlement agreement for one year from the date of this order. See Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of…