Embry

B&G Foods North America, Inc. v. Embry

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 10, 20242:20-cv-00526California1,250 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 B&G Foods North America, Inc., No. 2:20-cv-00526-KJM-SCR Plaintiff, ORDER Vv. Kim Embry and Environmental Health Advocates, Inc., acting as enforcement representatives under California Proposition 65 on behalf of the State of California Defendants.

Defendants Kim Embry and Environmental Health Advocates, Inc. move for summary judgment against plaintiff B&G Foods North America, Inc. (“B&G”). B&G has opposed the motion. The court denies the motion. The court incorporates by reference the factual background and procedural history of this 22 case from its prior orders. See Order (June 1, 2023), ECF No. 82; Order (Jan. 29, 2024), ECF No. 153; Order (Aug. 5, 2024), ECF No. 199. The court most recently granted B&G’s request to amend the case schedule and extend discovery, see Order (Aug. 5, 2024), after B&G persuasively 25 argued it has been unable to obtain “full and complete…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.