Taylor

(HC) Tennigkeit v. Taylor

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 11, 20241:24-cv-01057California1,531 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TYLER TENNIGKEIT, No. 1:24-cv-01057-SKO (HC) Petitioner, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

TO ASSIGN DISTRICT JUDGE

v.

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

TO DISMISS PETITION

WARDEN TAYLOR, FCI MENDOTA,

[30-DAY OBJECTION DEADLINE Respondent. 16 Petitioner is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. On September 5, 2024, Petitioner filed the instant habeas petition. (Doc. 1.) After conducting a preliminary review of the petition, the Court finds that Petitioner has failed to exhaust administrative remedies and failed to state a claim for relief. Accordingly, the Court will RECOMMEND the petition be DISMISSED. DISCUSSION I. Preliminary Review of Petition Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases1 allows a district court to dismiss a petition if it “plainly…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.