Schmidt

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL SCHMIDT, on behalf of Case No. 2:20-cv-2400-CSK himself and the Class and Collective members, Plaintiffs, ORDER v. VISION SERVICE PLAN, et al., Defendants. 17 The Court has received and reviewed Plaintiff Michael Schmidt’s proposed briefing schedule and request for a status conference (ECF No. 80), which has not been opposed by Defendants Vision Service Plan, VSP Global Inc., Marchon Eyewear, Inc., VSP Optical Group, Inc., and Eyefinity, Inc. (collectively “Defendants”). Plaintiff proposes submitting a renewed motion for final approval of the revised settlement agreement substituting the cy pres beneficiary with a new cy pres beneficiary without issuing supplemental notice to the class because the substitution of the cy pres beneficiary is a minor change to the agreement that “does not prejudice any class member or impair any class members’ rights, and has no material adverse effect on class members’ rights.” (ECF No. 80 at ¶ 6; see…