Marzan

(PC) Kendrid v. Marzan

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 10, 20242:22-cv-02301California523 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FORREST KENDRID, No. 2:22-cv-2301 TLN CSK P Plaintiff, v. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE MARZAN, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a former civil detainee, proceeding without counsel, with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. For the reasons stated herein, plaintiff is ordered to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. On June 27, 2024, the Court issued a further scheduling order. (ECF No. 36.) On July 8, 2024, the order was returned, marked “unclaimed.” Local Rule 183(b) requires that a party appearing in propria persona inform the court of any address change. Plaintiff has not filed a notice of change of address since his mail was returned. The inmate locator for the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”) confirms that plaintiff is no longer in state custody. In addition, court records from plaintiff’s 27 1 This information…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.