Pacheco

(PC) Price v. Pacheco

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 10, 20242:22-cv-01610California9,432 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JoANN PRICE, et al., No. 2:22-CV-1610-DAD-DMC-P Plaintiffs, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ARTURO PACHECO, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiffs, who are proceeding with retained counsel, bring this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiffs are the estate and successor-in-interest of Ronnie Price, who is deceased. Pending before the Court is the motion to dismiss Plaintiffs' third amended complaint filed by Defendants Lynch and Baughman. See ECF No. 130. The parties appeared for a hearing before the undersigned on April 24, 2024. At the hearing, the Court considered the parties' arguments and directed supplemental briefing on the following issues: (1) whether Plaintiffs have pleaded sufficient facts to establish the supervisory liability of Defendants Lynch and Baughman; and (2) whether the third amended complaint constitutes a "sham pleading." On May 8, 2024, the parties stipulated to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.