Abdulgader

(PC) Wolinski v. Abdulgader

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 11, 20242:21-cv-02078California924 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KRZYSZTOF F. WOLINSKI, No. 2:21-cv-02078-DJC-CKD Plaintiff, v. ORDER ABDULBASET ABDULGADER, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently pending before the court are defendants’ second motion to compel discovery responses from plaintiff (ECF No. 65) and a motion to further modify the court’s scheduling order (ECF No. 64). The court will address each motion in turn. By order dated June 3, 2024, the court granted defendants’ motion to compel and required plaintiff to serve his responses to defendants’ Interrogatories, Set One, and Request for Production of Documents, Set One, within 30 days. ECF No. 61. In the same order, the court modified the Discovery and Scheduling Order by resetting the discovery deadline to August 1, 2024 and the dispositive motions deadline to November 1, 2024. ECF No. 61 at…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.