Carter
Carter v. Jackson
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 11, 20241:23-cv-01775California4,275 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
JEFFREY CARTER, Case No. 1:23-cv-01775-KES-SAB
Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
RECOMMENDING GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S
v. RULE 41(a)(2) MOTION TO DISMISS
WITHOUT PREJUDICE; DENYING
WILLARD L. JACKSON, et al., DEFENDANT PETRESCU’S MOTION TO
DISMISS AS MOOT
Defendants.
VACATING OCTOBER 2, 2024 HEARING
13 (ECF Nos. 59, 60, 63, 64)
OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN DAYS
15 I. INTRODUCTION Currently before the Court are Defendant Vicent Petrescu’s1 motion to dismiss pursuant to Rules 12(b)(2) and 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (ECF No. 59) and Plaintiff Jeffrey Carter’s motion for voluntary dismissal pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) (ECF No. 60). The Court, having reviewed the record, finds both matters suitable for decision without oral argument. See Local Rule 230(g). Accordingly, the hearing set for October 2, 2024, will be vacated. Based on the moving and opposition papers, as well as the…