CDCR
(PC) Gardner v. CDCR
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL OWEN GARDNER, No. 1:24-cv-00933-JLT-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
RECOMMENDING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST
v. FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER
BE DENIED
CDCR, et al., (ECF No. 1) Defendants.
16 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the instant complaint on August 12, 2024. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. Within the complaint, Plaintiff seeks a temporary restraining order to protect disabled inmates, such as himself. (Compl. at 8-12.) I. LEGAL STANDARD Procedurally, a federal district court may issue emergency injunctive relief only if it has personal jurisdiction over the parties and subject matter jurisdiction over the lawsuit. See Murphy