Chandler v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JANINE CHANDLER, et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-01657-JLT-HBK Plaintiffs, v. ORDER DENYING KENNARD LEE
DAVIS’S MOTION FOR
JEFFREY MACOMBER, Secretary of the RECONSIDERATION AND REQUEST California Department of Corrections and FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE Rehabilitation, et al., (Doc. 106) Defendants. 17 Now pending is pro se inmate Kennard Lee Davis’s Motion for Reconsideration, brought pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b), and accompanying Request for Judicial Notice. (Doc. 106.) The Court has received both Davis’s motion and Plaintiffs’ Opposition, (Doc. 111), and need not wait for the Reply brief to rule on the motion. See Goldberg v. Barreca, 720 F. App’x 877, 878 (9th Cir. 2018) (“Because the Goldbergs could not raise new arguments in their reply brief to establish the necessary prima facie case, the district court was not required to wait for a reply brief before ruling.”) (citing, in part, Fed. R. Civ. P. 1);…