(HC) Papazian v. B.M. Trate

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 11, 20241:24-cv-00392California600 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMES MICHAEL PAPAZIAN, 1:24-cv-00392-HBK (HC) Petitioner,

ORDER DISREGARDING PETITIONER’S

v. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME AND

DENYING MOTION FOR COPIES

B.M. TRATE, (Doc. Nos. 15, 16) Respondent.

ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENT’S

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

(Doc. No. 17)

18 Petitioner, a federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this habeas corpus action filed a motion for extension of time and motion for copies on September 9, 2024. (Doc. No. 15, 16). Petitioner requests an extension of time to file a reply to Respondent’s response, which he believes is overdue but not yet received due to mail interruption caused by a mailroom clerk’s death. (Doc. No. 15). On August 4, 2024, the Court granted Respondent an extension of time until September 10, 2024 to file a response to Petitioner’s First Amended Petition. (Doc. No. 14). Further, herein, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.