Moore

Moore v. Walmart Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 12, 20242:24-cv-01105California1,559 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Riley Moore, No. 2:24-ev-01105-KJM-JDP Plaintiff, ORDER v. Walmart, Inc.; Walmart LLC; Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., a corporation; Wal-Mart Associates, Inc., a corporation; Sonia Melchor, an individual; Magali Bedolla, an individual; and Does 1 to 100, inclusive, 17 Defendants. 18 Plaintiff Riley Moore argues this court lacks diversity jurisdiction and moves to remand 20 this matter to state court. Defendants Walmart Inc. and Wal-Mart Associates, Inc. oppose.! For the reasons explained below, the court grants the motion to remand. 22 I. BACKGROUND Moore, previously employed at a Wal-Mart store, brought this action for wrongful 24 termination in violation of public policy, disability discrimination, disability harassment, failure 25 to accommodate, failure to engage in interactive process, retaliation in violation of the Fair

' Defendants argue Walmart Inc. and Wal-Mart Associates are the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.