Pfieffer

(PC) Stone v. Pfieffer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 12, 20241:21-cv-01461California1,481 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ADAM JAY STONE, No. 1:21-cv-01461-KES-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR ISSUANCE OF DISCOVERY

v. SANCTIONS C. PFEIFFER, et al., (ECF No. 169) Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Adam Jay Stone is proceeding pro se in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for issuance of monetary sanctions, filed August 16, 2024. (ECF No. 169.) Defendants filed an opposition on August 30, 2024. (ECF No. 172.) The Court deems Plaintiff’s motion submitted as a reply is not necessary. I. RELEVANT BACKGROUND This action is proceeding Plaintiff’s excessive force claim against Defendants B. Gonzales, G. Morales, K. Gonzales, and Anderson in violation of the Eighth Amendment. Defendants filed an answer to the complaint on October 19, 2022. (ECF No. 48.) On…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.