(PC)Hagan

(PC)Hagan v. Recarey

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 13, 20241:22-cv-00562California672 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 KEVIN HAGAN, Case No. 1:22-cv-00562-JLT-EPG Plaintiff, v. ORDER REGARDING MOTION TO

WITHDRAW AS ATTORNEY FOR

RAUL RECAREY, et al., PLAINTIFF Defendants. (ECF No. 56) 15 16 On September 11, 2024, Attorney Benjamin Rudin moved to withdraw as Plaintiff’s 17 counsel, “because Plaintiff has rendered carrying out his representation unreasonably difficult.” 18 (ECF No. 56). 19 Local Rule 182 provides that an attorney who has appeared on behalf of a client may not 20 withdraw, leaving the client in propria persona, without leave of court: (d) Withdrawal. Unless otherwise provided herein, an attorney who has appeared may not withdraw leaving the client in propria persona without leave of court upon 22 noticed motion and notice to the client and all other parties who have appeared. The attorney shall provide an affidavit stating the current or last known address or addresses of the client and the efforts made to notify the client of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.