(PS) Santillan v. California Bar Examiners

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHELSIE M. SANTILLAN, Case No. 2:24-cv-00571-DJC-JDP (PS) Plaintiff, v. ORDER CALIFORNIA BAR EXAMINERS, et al., Defendants. 16 On August 15, 2024, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties, and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff filed objections on August 23, 2024, and Defendant filed objections on August 29, 2024. Both objections were considered by the undersigned. The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The Magistrate Judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law by the magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court . . . .”). Having reviewed the file, the…