Orozco

Orozco v. FCA US LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 13, 20241:21-cv-01674California422 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ISIDRO OROZCO, et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-01674-SAB

Plaintiffs, ORDER REQUIRING PARTIES TO SHOW

CAUSE IN WRITING WHY MONETARY

v. SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT ISSUE FOR

FAILURE TO FILE DISPOSITIONAL

FCA US, LLC, DOCUMENTS

Defendant. (ECF No. 62)

SEPTEMBER 20, 2024 DEADLINE

17 Plaintiffs filed this action on November 19, 2021. (ECF No. 1.) On February 24, 2022, 18 Defendant filed its answer to the complaint. (ECF No. 10.) On August 28, 2024, Plaintiffs filed 19 a document requesting dismissal pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil 20 Procedure. (ECF No. 61.) However, the request was filed as a “motion to dismiss” and is signed 21 only by Plaintiffs. (Id. at 2.) On August 29, 2024, the Court issued an order disregarding the 22 defective request for dismissal because it is not a signed stipulation by all parties who have 23 appeared, and it is not a proper motion under Rule 41(a)(2). (ECF No. 62.) The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.