Orozco
Orozco v. FCA US LLC
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 13, 20241:21-cv-01674California422 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
ISIDRO OROZCO, et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-01674-SAB
Plaintiffs, ORDER REQUIRING PARTIES TO SHOW
CAUSE IN WRITING WHY MONETARY
v. SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT ISSUE FOR
FAILURE TO FILE DISPOSITIONAL
FCA US, LLC, DOCUMENTS
Defendant. (ECF No. 62)
SEPTEMBER 20, 2024 DEADLINE
17 Plaintiffs filed this action on November 19, 2021. (ECF No. 1.) On February 24, 2022, 18 Defendant filed its answer to the complaint. (ECF No. 10.) On August 28, 2024, Plaintiffs filed 19 a document requesting dismissal pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil 20 Procedure. (ECF No. 61.) However, the request was filed as a “motion to dismiss” and is signed 21 only by Plaintiffs. (Id. at 2.) On August 29, 2024, the Court issued an order disregarding the 22 defective request for dismissal because it is not a signed stipulation by all parties who have 23 appeared, and it is not a proper motion under Rule 41(a)(2). (ECF No. 62.) The…