(PC) Rood v. Department of Corrections

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

COLTON JAMES ROOD, ) Case No.: 1:19-cv-01517 JLT HBK ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER ADOPTING IN FULL THE FINDINGS ) AND RECOMMENDATIONS, GRANTING v. ) DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY ) JUDGMENT, AND DIRECTING THE CLERK OF N. KEOVILAY-SEE and SCOTT ) COURT TO CLOSE THE CASE

FRAUENHEIM, )

) (Docs. 90, 92) Defendants. ) )

Colton James Rood seeks to hold the defendants liable for violations of his rights under the Eighth Amendment pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Defendants Keovilay-See and Frauenheim1 moved for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Doc. 90.) The magistrate judge found “there is no genuine dispute of material facts as to whether Defendant Keovilay-See failed to protect Plaintiff from a serious threat to his safety in violation of the Eighth Amendment and whether Defendant Frauenheim failed to train…