Hill

Hill v. Gergun Transportation Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 16, 20242:24-cv-01751California10,030 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 STELLA MAE HILL, Case No. 2:24-cv-1751-CSK Plaintiff, ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO

DISMISS AND MOTION TO TRANSFER

v. VENUE GERGUN TRANSPORTATION, INC, (ECF No. 11) Defendant. 16 Plaintiff Stella Mae Hill asserts California state law claims for failure to pay final wages upon termination, failure to reimburse business expenses, retaliation, and wrongful termination in violation of public policy against Defendant Gergun Transportation, Inc. and 25 Doe Defendants.1 Compl. (ECF No. 1 at 9-20.) Currently before the Court is Defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction, improper venue, and failure to state a claim. Def. Mot. (ECF No. 11.) A hearing was held on Defendant’s motion to dismiss on August 27, 2024. (ECF No. 15.) For the reasons that follow, Defendant’s motion to dismiss is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The Court finds it has personal jurisdiction over Defendant and venue…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.