Artiaga

Artiaga v. Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 16, 20241:23-cv-01138California3,464 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 BRIGITTE A. ARTIAGA, Case No. 1:23-cv-01138-KES-EPG Plaintiff, v. ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

JAGUAR LAND ROVER NORTH TO COMPEL

AMERICA LLC,

(ECF No. 32) Defendant.

16 In this removed civil case asserting various violations of the Song-Beverly Warranty Act, 17 Plaintiff Brigette A. Artiaga alleges that the 2020 Land Rover Range Rover Velar she purchased 18 was impaired by defects and required Defendant Jaguar Land Rover North America LLC to 19 repurchase the vehicle. (ECF No. 1-1). Before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion to compel seeking 20 an order requiring Defendant to produce various documents and a deponent, brought pursuant to Rules 26 and 37 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and Local Rule 251. (ECF Nos. 32). For the reasons given below, the Court grants in part and denies in part the motion to compel. I. BACKGROUND On April 15, 2024, the Court held a status conference…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.