Rangel

Rangel v. Loancare, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 16, 20241:24-cv-00642California3,793 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LEXUS RANGEL and GRANT BICE, Case No. 1:24-cv-00642-JLT-CDB individually, and on behalf of all other similarly situated consumers, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO COMPEL

ARBITRATION AND STAYING CASE

Plaintiffs, PENDING RESOLUTION OF

ARBITRATION

v. (Doc. 16) EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., et al., 16 Defendants. 17 I. INTRODUCTION Experian Information Solution, Inc.’s seeks to compel arbitration against Lexus Rangel and Grant Bice under the Federal Arbitration Act. (Doc. 16.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS the motion to compel arbitration. II. BACKGROUND Plaintiffs filed their complaint against Experian and Loancare (collectively “Defendants”), asserting the following claims: (1) a violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act § 1681 by both Defendants; (2) a violation of the Consumer Credit Reporting Agencies Act under Cal. Civil Code § 1785.1, et seq. by both Defendants; and (3) a violation…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.