Hughes

Hughes v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 17, 20241:23-cv-00949California2,858 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHELLE HUGHES, an individual, Case No. 1:23-cv-00949-JLT-BAM Plaintiff, ORDER VACATING SEPTEMBER 20, 2024 HEARING v.

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

WAL-MART ASSOCIATES, INC., a MOTION TO MODIFY THE Delaware Corporation; and DOES SCHEDULING ORDER PURSUANT TO through 50, inclusive, FRCP 16(b)(4), AND FOR LEAVE TO FILE

PLAINTIFF’S PROPOSED FIRST

Defendants. AMENDED COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO FRCP 15(a)(2) 17 (Doc. 27)

19 Currently pending before the Court is Plaintiff Michelle Hughes’s motion to modify the Scheduling Order for the limited purpose of allowing Plaintiff to amend her complaint and to grant Plaintiff leave to file her proposed First Amended Complaint. (Doc. 27.) Defendant Wal- Mart Associates, Inc. filed a response to the motion, which indicated that Defendant “will respectfully decline to file an opposition [and] will instead defer to this Court’s sound judgment.” (Doc. 32.) In the absence of any opposition, the motion…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.