Escobedo

Escobedo v. Thuong

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 16, 20241:24-cv-01081California1,059 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOSE ESCOBEDO,

9 Case No. 1:24-cv-01081-JLT-SKO Plaintiff,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE

v. SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION

QUE T. THUONG dba Pho Paradise Restaurant, et al., 14 DAY DEADLINE Defendants.

14 15 On September 12, 2024, Plaintiff Jose Escobedo (“Plaintiff”) filed his complaint against 16 Defendants Que T. Thuong, doing business as Pho Paradise Restaurant; Truong Van Pham, doing 17 business as Pho Paradise Restaurant; and TC Property Management, LTD (“Defendants”), alleging 18 claims under the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act 19 (“Unruh Act”), and California’s Health and Safety Code. (Doc. 1). These claims stem from alleged 20 barriers Plaintiff encountered (such as lack of proper pavement markings and excessive slopes in 21 paths of travel) while he visited “Pho Paradise Restaurant,” a facility owned, operated, or leased by 22 Defendants. (See id.) 23 Based upon the Ninth Circuit opinion in Vo v. Choi, the Court will order Plaintiff…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.