Moghaddam

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANDREW VASQUEZ, No. 2:19-cv-01283-TLN-AC Plaintiff, v. ORDER EILYA MOGHADDAM, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On July 31, 2024, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. Plaintiff filed objections to the findings and recommendations along with a motion for an extension of time so that his objections would be timely filed. However, Plaintiff’s objections were timely filed without the need for an extension of time. See Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266 (1988) (establishing the prison mailbox rule). As a…