Unknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FLETCHER LEGARDY, No. 2:23-cv-01055-TLN-SCR Plaintiff, v. ORDER UNKNOWN, Defendant.

17 Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On April 19, 2024, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on Plaintiff, and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 6.) The time to file objections passed, and Plaintiff did not file any objections. The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the file, the Court finds…