(PC) Rodriguez v. Solano State Prison

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 17, 20242:21-cv-00622California940 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTONIO RODRIGUEZ, No. 2:21-cv-00622-SCR-P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

SOLANO STATE PRISON, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Antonio Rodriguez, a state prisoner, proceeds pro se and in forma pauperis with a second amended civil rights complaint. (ECF No. 21.) On March 21, 2023, the court ordered that service of plaintiff’s second amended complaint was warranted for defendant nurses N. Sabati and G. Coder (ECF No. 24.) On April 11, 2024, plaintiff requested an extension of time for the U.S. Marshal to serve the defendants. (ECF No. 39.) While that motion is now likely moot for the reasons explained below, to the extent it matters, and good cause appearing, plaintiff’s request for an extension of time is granted. However, the U.S. Marshal service has been unable to locate defendant Coder with the information provided by plaintiff. Plaintiff’s claims against defendant Coder should be dismissed without…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.