Malik
Malik v. Malik
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GHAUS MALIK, et al., No. 2:23-cv-1344-CKD Plaintiffs, v. ORDER FARHAN MALIK, et al., Defendants. 16 Before the court are two motions to dismiss the Third Amended Complaint (TAC), filed June 24, 2024. ECF No. 60. The Malik defendants have filed a motion to dismiss the TAC for lack of jurisdiction and failure to state a claim. ECF No. 67. Plaintiffs have opposed the motion (ECF No. 74), and defendants have filed a reply (ECF No. 82).1 The Wells Fargo defendants have filed a motion to dismiss the TAC for failure to state a claim or, in the alternative, to send the claims to arbitration per the parties’ arbitration agreement. ECF No. 69. Plaintiffs have filed an opposition (ECF No. 78), and the Wells Fargo defendants have filed a reply. ECF No. 84.
1 Per the court’s August 2, 2024, order, plaintiffs have filed a short brief on the issue of whether 26 the Malik defendants were properly served in this action. ECF No. 86.…