(SS) Peters v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 18, 20242:23-cv-01924California3,661 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 HENDERSON PETERS, No. 2:23-cv-01924 AC Plaintiff, v. ORDER COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

SECURITY,

15 Defendant.

17 Plaintiff seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”), denying his application for Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) under Title XVI of the Social Security Act (the “Act”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 1381-1383f. For the reasons that follow, the court will DENY plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and GRANT the Commissioner’s cross-motion for summary judgment. //// ////

SSI is paid to financially needy disabled persons. 42 U.S.C. § 1382(a); Washington State Dept. of Social and Health Services v. Guardianship Estate of Keffeler, 537 U.S. 371, 375 (2003) (“Title XVI of the Act, § 1381 et seq., is the Supplemental Security Income (SSI) scheme of benefits for aged, blind, or disabled individuals, including children, whose income and assets fall below specified levels . .…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.