(PC) Kononov v. Sacramento County Sheriff Dept.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 19, 20242:22-cv-01916California516 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KONONOV VITALY, No. 2:22-CV-1916-DAD-DMC-P Plaintiff, v. ORDER SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, et al., 15 Defendants.

17 Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On August 1, 2024, the Court determined service of Plaintiff's second amended complaint was appropriate for Defendants Leahy and Vice and directed Plaintiff to submit documents for service of the action by the United States Marshal. See ECF No. 17. Among other documents, Plaintiff was required to submit three copies of the second amended complaint. See id. On August 30, 2024, Plaintiff submitted documents. See ECF No. 19. Plaintiff did not, however, submit with his documents three copies of the second amended complaint. He submitted only one copy. Plaintiff will be directed to supplement his August 30, 2024, submission of documents by submitting two additional copies of the second…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.